YJIT Benchmarks

Details for Benchmarks at 2021-11-15 16:02:17

Overall YJIT is 39.5% faster than interpreted CRuby!

The basic "faster" measurement is the geomean of all "headlining" x86 benchmarks on this page.

Headlining Benchmarks

These are "headlining" because the "overall" speedup above is based on these benchmarks specifically.

Speed of each Ruby implementation (iterations/second) relative to the CRuby interpreter. Higher is better.

Other Benchmarks

Speed of each Ruby implementation (iterations/second) relative to the CRuby interpreter. Higher is better.

MicroBenchmarks

Speed of each Ruby implementation (iterations/second) relative to the CRuby interpreter. Higher is better.

Want Raw Graphs and CSV?

Benchmarks Speed Details

Benchmark Memory Usage Details

Number of Iterations and Warmups Tested

bench No JIT warmups No JIT iters MJIT3.0 warmups MJIT3.0 iters YJIT warmups YJIT iters
activerecord 1 68 1 62 1 94
lee 1 8 1 10 1 12
30k_methods 1 5 1 5 1 13

Different Ruby configurations want different amounts of warmup. With no JIT, CRuby needs hardly any. YJIT and MJIT 3.0 both warm up quite quickly, while MJIT in 3.1 often slows down for a time as it compiles, after an unpredictable delay.

Benchmark YJIT Stats

Hover your cursor over the benchmark names for descriptions of each benchmark.

bench Exit Report Inline Outlined Comp iSeqs Comp Blocks Inval Inval Ratio Bind Alloc Bind Set Const Bumps
activerecord (click) 969450 678656 184 1176 0 0% 0 0 0
lee (click) 330026 230067 32 439 70 15% 0 0 12
30k_methods (click) 2116133 1608718 5777 19342 0 0% 0 0 0

YJIT stats correspond to the YJIT stats exit report.

Note: currently, all stats are collected on x86_64, not ARM.

Raw JSON data files

All graphs and table data in this page comes from processing these data files, which come from benchmark runs.